With one half of the Sports Cartel Patriots blogging duo out traveling, Amy is stuck with single parent duties this week.
She will remember that on Father’s Day, Chris. Super Bowl week. You think you’re getting in a leisurely 18 down at the local course that morning?
(I won’t even get into the capital I’m gaining in having to go to a wedding this afternoon, and I’m not even a Patriots or a Giants fan)
Amy did have a dream the other night, though. It may or may not have been caused by spicy food at bedtime, but she envisioned a 38-0 halftime lead for New England, and Hiliary Clinton winning the Democratic nomination.
Not even sure how to respond, because this very well could be Amy proving her psychic ability. hmmm…
Anyway, she also gets into the Most Popular Politician in Boston…not Clinton, Sen. Arlen Spector (R) of Pennsylvania, who, you may have heard, has called the NFL onto the carpet to explain why video evidence behind Spygate was destroyed.
ESPN’s Len Pasquarelli agrees with Land of Patriots.
Now…before we tar and feather him in written word, it needs to be pointed out that:
1. The NFL has a government-recognized anti-trust exemption, and that very much makes it Mr. Specter’s business (he’s the ranking member of the senate judiciary committee). So does professional baseball, by the way, and the government has a funny way of wanting to get involved in issues involving illegal drug sales and use and tax evasion.
2. Please spare us the “they have better things to do” argument. It’s not like your team got pulled over for speeding; Commissioner Goodell simply needs to explain why they had enough evidence on one tape to dock the Pats a draft pick and a total of $750,000, but the other five tapes were destroyed. I think the fans of the game (the people who shell out hundreds of dollars in merchandise and thousands of dollars in lost productivity at work) deserve at least a sworn statement as to why they chose to do that.
Taking out team bias from the equation, this is what you have: A multi-billion dollar U.S.-based industry in which is connected to basically every family in the country in some way has something of a controversial issue. After telling the followers of that company (the NFL) the guilty parties were fined quite extraordinarily, the leaders of that company sweep the matter under the rug, and we find out later there could have been far more evidence implicating more people, or further lessening the integrity of the company without providing a decent reason to do so.
It’s rarely about what you do when you get caught covering it up.
But is anyone going to be safe? The Matt Walsh story officially came into the press this week, after rumors floating around the media about his alleged “massive story” and how (I was told a while back, but asked not to print until it came out) “it could bring the league down to the depths of where baseball currently is.
Basically, my source said this has teeth.
From the same New York Times article as Specter’s declaration of war on Goodell:
“If someone wanted me to talk and tell them things, I would craft an agreement where they would agree from now until the end of my existence to pay for any legal fees that came up in regards to this, whether I’m sued by the Patriots, the N.F.L., anybody else,” he said.
Two things, really. First, I’m not naive enough to think that every low-level employee of an NFL team doesn’t have dirt on the team employing him or her. I know people who work/have worked for the Minnesota Vikings who spill plenty of stories about certain players’ affinity for certain illegal substances (white, not green). And while I could very easily substantiate those stories with others willing to speak on the record, how would either my friends or myself gain anything from that?
This leads me to the second part: why would Walsh bother mentioning anything at all if he can’t profit from it financially somehow? Apparently, he signed a confidentiality agreement with the Patriots (that in and of itself is enough to turn heads. Outside The Lines, how ’bout a piece on how many teams make their employees sign one of those), so if he wrote a tell-all book, he’d have a tough time getting past the fact he’s obligated to not say a word about the things he saw or was asked to do.
Most media organizations hold to the standards of the Code of Ethics provided by the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), and accepting idemnifcation agreements, like Walsh requested, is against that.
So now that Walsh let the cat take a peek at what’s outside the bag, he’s going to have a real tough time keeping it in there, and no rational thinking media organization is going to accept the legal windfall that will come with him airing the inside garbage he has.
He’s going to have a tough time keeping it quiet, and he’s going to have an even tougher time profitting on this in any way.
Burress stands on sideline, holding helmet, not pissing anyone off
Giants WR Plaxico Burress has pissed off most people outside of New York in preparation for Super Bowl XLII, if it wasn’t making predictions (23-17??). Now, along with the ankle injury he’s been nursing all season, he’s listed as questionable on the Giants injury report with a left knee injury.
Scoring 23 points is optimistic if Burress is not 100 percent. Amani Toomer and Steven Smith have had bricks for hands for much of the season, and giving Bill Belichick and the Patriots defense two weeks to prepare for a quarterback rarely results in a career passing day for him.
Burress is a gamer, and he’ll be out there, but without baring at least something of a deep threat, the Giants offense is going to struggle to get out of first gear. The last thing they want is to get Seau and Bruschi attacking the line of scrimmage; if New York can get both of them and Rodney Harrison dropping back into coverage, they may have a chance to do some damage. But if Manning is only able to consistently complete swing passes right at the Patriots’ athletic corners, Amy’s 38-0 haltime dream could become reality.